dots
/
dwm
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

pretty printing bugs a bit

This commit is contained in:
Anselm R Garbe 2010-04-01 22:34:46 +01:00
parent a88e0373ef
commit 427053f8d1
1 changed files with 31 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

45
BUGS
View File

@ -1,34 +1,40 @@
---
18:17 < Biolunar> when i change my resolution in dwm (to a smaller one) and then back to the native, the top bar is not repainted. that's since 5.7.2, in 5.6 it worked fine
18:19 < Biolunar> is it just happening to me or a (known) bug?
18:24 < Biolunar> and in addition, mplayers fullscreen is limited to the small resolution after i changed it back to the native
reproducible with xrandr -s but not with --output and --mode, strange
---
> enternotify is handled even when the entered window is already focused
> (eg moving the mouse to the bar and back, scrolling on the border..)
>
> focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
>
> a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
>
> + c = wintoclient(ev->window);
> if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
> unfocus(selmon->sel);
> selmon = m;
> }
> + else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
> + return;
>
> focusing might be expensive for some clients (eg dim/light up)
>
> a possible solution is to modify enternotify:
>
> + c = wintoclient(ev->window);
> if((m = wintomon(ev->window)) && m != selmon) {
> unfocus(selmon->sel);
> selmon = m;
> }
> + else if (c == selmon->sel || c == NULL)
> + return;
---
> another corner case:
a tiled client can be resized with mod+right click, but it only works
on the main monitor
---
dmenu appears on the monitor where the pointer is and not on selmon
---
yet another corner case:
open a terminal, focus another monitor, but without moving the mouse
@ -36,7 +42,6 @@ pointer there
if there is no client on the other monitor to get the focus, then the
terminal will be unfocused but it will accept input
---
Donald Allen reported this:
@ -57,3 +62,15 @@ privmail from 2 other people within one week, really strange).
The quick fix is commenting out the code in lines 817/818 in hg tip
dwm. I cannot confirm this has no side effects (I think it does) and I
will address this issue shortly with a real fix.
---
SDL seems to not like non-reparenting WMs:
> I would like to mention SDL problems, however SDL is not crucial to
> me anymore; people that really care about it should speak up and
> propose dwm / SDL patch or cooperation scheme in that matter.
Patching SDL, bugging them?
---